Cases 71 - 80 of 791
Holmes v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv14066
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Captain Kent Campbell, Sergeant Christian Mathisen and Sheriff Deryl Loar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv16816
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04746
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saahir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Subutiya Saahir
Defendant:
United States of America, Virginia J. Holmes, Ariana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv13582
Plaintiff:
Terase Holmes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02748
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUPERT HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEMOORE HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
BYRON HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
