Cases 71 - 80 of 124
Mamon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00048
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Howard Prince and James Rogers
Plaintiff:
Annie Mamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Prince et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Defendant:
Matthew Gamble, Howard Prince and Sanket Veas
Plaintiff:
Carlton Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Prince et al
as 3:2011cv00010
Defendant:
Dept of Public Safety and Corrections, John Doe "A", John Doe "B" and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2010cv00825
Defendant:
Charlene Haydel, James M. LeBlanc and Howard Prince
Plaintiff:
Vernell Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Prince et al
as 2:2010cv04453
Plaintiff:
Gregg J. Stanley
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Prince et al
as 3:2010cv00778
Plaintiff:
Marvin Brown
Defendant:
Unknown Fisher, Howard Prince and Unknown Stark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fountain v. Prince et al
as 3:2010cv00773
Defendant:
Daniel Biggs and Howard Prince
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Prince et al
as 2:2010cv03890
Plaintiff:
Milton Green
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley v. Hunt Correctional Center et al
as 3:2010cv00735
Defendant:
Hunt Correctional Center and Howard Prince
Plaintiff:
Darrell Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kebodeaux v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2010cv00627
Defendant:
2 Unnamed Disciplinary Board Members, James LeBlanc, Howard Prince and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Kebodeaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
