Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Sarabjit Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-2852
Petitioner:
SARABJIT SINGH
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Edward Johnson, III v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 17-2826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JOHNSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, DAVID HARLOW and THOMAS R. KANE
Francisco Andrade-Varela v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-2797
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANDRADE-VARELA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Xiu Zhang v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-2758
Petitioner:
XIU J. ZHANG, also known as XIU JUAN ZHENG, also known as MONG-THU DOAN
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Manjit Sembhi v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2746
Petitioner:
MANJIT SINGH SEMBHI
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Fernando Holguin-Gutierrez v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2700
Petitioner:
FERNANDO HOLGUIN-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Sergio Venegas-Navarrete v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2686
Petitioner:
SERGIO VENEGAS-NAVARRETE
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Juan Celis-Alvarez v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2692
Petitioner:
JUAN PABLO CELIS-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Peter Nebus v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
as 17-2672
Petitioner:
PETER NEBUS
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of Homeland Security, ELAINE C. DUKE, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Mohammed Adam v. Jefferson Sessions III
as 17-2652
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED ADAM
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
