Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Zepeda v. Peterson, et al.
as 1:2012cv01085
Plaintiff:
Jaime L. Zepeda
Defendant:
T. Peterson, D. Randall, R. Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor G. Ramirez v. Matthew Cate et al
as 5:2012cv00849
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Lt P Covello, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Victor G Ramirez
Gregory Lee McCall v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv03340
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Jane Doe, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Phillip Morris Jr. v. James Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv02823
Defendant:
M Baxstresser, Efren Cabero, Efren Cabreros and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Morris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaklin Benji v. Bank of America Corp et al
as 2:2011cv08882
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp, John Jane Does and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Jaklin Benji
Diversified Golf LLC v. Trans World Commercial and Equity LLC et al
as 2:2011cv06924
Defendant:
Jack Avedikian, Jane Boyles, John Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diversified Golf LLC
Richard A Roy v. Agents of Defendants CA Dept of Corr et al
as 2:2011cv06844
Defendant:
Agents of Defendants CA Dept of Corr, CA Board of Prison Hearings, CA Dept of Corr and Rehab Adult Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A Roy
Diversified Golf LLC v. Trans World Commercial and Equity LLC et al
as 2:2011mc00320
Defendant:
Jack Avedikian, Jane Boyles, John Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diversified Golf LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01719
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mitchell v. Zola Investment Two, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mitchell
Defendant:
Zola Investment Two, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., First American Title Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
