Cases 71 - 80 of 1,435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Martin v. Perkins, Jr. et al
as 9:2023cv80948
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Martin
Defendant:
Richard G. Perkins, Jr., Paradise Marine, LLC, Perkins Development Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gerow v. Warren et al
as 8:2023cv01286
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
Elizabeth Warren, Kristin Esposito, Cynthia Biron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santana v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Santana
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Williams, Sheriff T.K. Waters, Officer M.A. Morel-Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STILWELL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al.,
as 1:2023cv21920
Defendant:
CHARLES LESLIE STILWELL, DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Couture et al v. Noshirvan et al
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Couture and Ralph Garramone, M.D. doing business as Garramone Plastic Surgery
Defendant:
Danesh Noshirvan, TikTok, Inc., ByteDance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SUN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 1:2023cv21855
Defendant:
DIN YUAN STEVEN SUN, DEFENDANT 1, JOHN DOES 1 - 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
