Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Boyd v. Arnone et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00824
Plaintiff: Ray Victor Boyd
Defendant: Leo Arnone, Anthony Bruno, Patrick Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vializ et al v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2011cv00329
Plaintiff: David Vializ and Gabriel Cintron
Defendant: Jame Dzurenda, Michael Lajoie, Regan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vializ v. Moss et al
as 3:2011cv00227
Plaintiff: David Vializ
Defendant: Moss, Whiddon, Jame Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff: Michael S. Davis and Marques Lindsey
Defendant: James Dzurenda, Scott Semple, T. Bogdanoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vializ v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2011cv00150
Plaintiff: David Vializ
Defendant: James Dzurenda, Wayne Choinski, Anne Cournoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Codio v. Department of Corr et al
as 3:2010cv01660
Plaintiff: Joseph Codio
Defendant: Department of Corr, Garner Corr Inst, Chesire Corr Inst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoth v. Lantz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01081
Plaintiff: Craig Hoth
Defendant: Theresa Lantz, James Dzurenda, Danielle Borges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Dzurenda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00880
Plaintiff: William J. McKinney
Defendant: James Dzurenda, Daniel Almeida and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Murphy et al
as 3:2009cv01601
Plaintiff: Clarence Patterson
Defendant: Brian Murphy, Mark Strange, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Such v. Dzurenda
as 3:2009cv01346
Petitioner: David O'Such
Respondent: James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?