Cases 71 - 80 of 399
Kozitzki v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Administration, UTMB Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
James Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bryant v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00140
Petitioner:
Terrance Bryant
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kozitzki v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
County v. Wolfe et al
as 4:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Olivia D County
Defendant:
Nelson Wolfe, Javier Salazar, Teresa Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
County v. Wolfe et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Olivia D County
Defendant:
Nelson Wolfe, Javier Salazar, Teresa Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foxx v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Sean Foxx
Respondent:
Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armour v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Lyndon Armour
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kozitzki v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund, TDCJ Commissary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foxx v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Sean Foxx
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
