Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Smotherman v. Beene et al
as 3:2009mc00179
Plaintiff: Patrick E. Smotherman
Defendant: Merrill Beene, Gary Flangan, Rusty N. Perkins and others
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009cv00667
Petitioner: Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent: Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arendall v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00636
Petitioner: William David Arendall
Respondent: Tennessee Department of Correction, George Little and Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009mc00146
Petitioner: Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent: Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Lee v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01139
Petitioner: Terry James Lee
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Easterling
as 1:2009cv01136
Petitioner: Thomas Earl Williams
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Easterling
as 2:2009cv02362
Petitioner: Antonio Sanders
Respondent: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cathey v. Easterling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00429
Plaintiff: Gregory Cathey
Defendant: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Arendall v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2009mc00088
Petitioner: William David Arendall
Respondent: Tennessee Department of Correction, George Little and Joe Easterling
Jackson v. Easterling
as 2:2009cv02263
Petitioner: Ronnie Jackson
Respondent: Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?