Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez v. Baca et al
as 1:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Baca, Jennifer Jara, Leah Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kelly Springer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Board of Commissioners of Catron County, New Mexico v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Board of Commissioners of Catron County, New Mexico
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hinojos et al v. Hobbs Municipal School District et al
as 2:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jose Hinojos and Selena Hinojos
Defendant:
Hobbs Municipal School District, T.J. Parks, John Notaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly et al v. Romines et al
as 1:2011mc00047
Movant:
Judith Elsea
Plaintiff:
C. Bradford Kelly and Elizabeth B. Kelly
Defendant:
Joel C. Romines and Patricia B. Romines
Sundance Services, Inc. v. Roach et al
as 1:2011cv00968
Plaintiff:
Sundance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Donna Roach , Kelly Roach and Michael Patterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Herrick et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2011cv00624
Defendant:
Leah Kelly and Jennifer Jara
Plaintiff:
Michael Herrick and Jennifer Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McNally et al v. Tiger Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip A McNally , Bryan DeWitt , Arizona Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Tiger Plumbing, Inc., Rob Allen Biedermann, Kelly Bidermann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
