Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,216
Jia LI v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3656
Petitioner: JIA LI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Li v. Lu
as 3:2024cv05604
Defendant: James Fu Bin Lu
Plaintiff: Yonggang Li
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv06263
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Liu v. Li et al
as 1:2024cv06422
Plaintiff: Xiansong (Tony) Liu
Defendant: Hongye Li, Ying Hua and North Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05193
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FCA US LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv06273
Plaintiff: FCA US LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Yiwu Ruiyi Trading Co., Ltd, LOVELADUO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05167
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01106
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?