Cases 71 - 80 of 531
Close et al v. Eldo Organic, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Steve Close, Alex Close, Stephen Close and others
Defendant:
Jack Mitchell, BesaMe Wellness IP, LLC, Tom Elafross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Close v. Close et al
as 2:2022oe01629
Plaintiff:
Stephen Close
Defendant:
Alexander Close, Jack Mitchell, BesaMe Wellness IP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Kevin Noel Mitchell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Duran Tyson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leiser v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Leiser
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. CR Bard, Inc. et al.
as 2:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Mitchell
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDuffie v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
William McDuffie
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05952
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Mitchell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01992
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Foster v. Portage County, et al
as 5:2021cv01983
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Foster
Defendant:
Portage County, Leonard Hazelett, Don P. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
