Cases 71 - 80 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rom v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marshall Rom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Guillette et al v. PD-RX Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00564
Plaintiff:
Eileen Guillette , Phyllis Guines , Wilhelmina Gunter and others
Defendant:
PD-RX Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beard v. Patton et al
as 4:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
David Earl Beard
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Janet Dowling, Carl Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Maurice Morlee Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Stephens, Logan County Jail, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacquet v. Weir et al
as 5:2014cv01332
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Bacquet
Respondent:
J Weir and US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2014cv01298
Plaintiff:
Ardell Levert Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, Federal Tranfer Center Correctional Officers, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Williams v. Trammell et al
as 6:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
David Keith Williams
Defendant:
Anita Trammell, John Marlar, Mona Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shells v. X-Spine Systems Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
Marshall Ray Shells
Defendant:
X-Spine Systems Inc , Surgical Innovations LLC and Tedan Surgical Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. Rios et al
as 5:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
Billy G Marshall
Defendant:
H A Rios, Jr, FNU Stofer and Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
