Cases 71 - 80 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kelly v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01897
Plaintiff:
Bart Kelly
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Ocwen Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GULAS et al v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2013cv00914
Plaintiff:
THEODORE J. GULAS and JUDY A. GULAS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beauman v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2013cv01795
Plaintiff:
Juanita M Beauman
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SADLER et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2013cv03412
Plaintiff:
ROY SADLER and FRANKA SADLER
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIXON v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 5:2013cv03199
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH DIXON
Defendant:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and DOES 1 THRU 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOSS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RAYMOND MOSS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
