Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv10896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams et al v. Mason et al
as 5:2009cv10121
Plaintiff:
Theodore Williams and Nancy Price
Defendant:
Khary Mason, Terry Cross-Nelson, Otis Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephan v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2008cv14451
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stephan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Brooks Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv14114
Plaintiff:
Otis James Brooks Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dearborn Heights, City of, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brooks Bey v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv14112
Plaintiff:
Otis James Brooks Bey
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dearborn Heights, City of, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv11801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Incorporated et al v. Brooks-Bey
as 2:2008cv11149
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Incorporated and US Bank NA
Defendant:
Otis James Brooks-Bey
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Fields v. HSBC et al
as 2:2007cv13561
Plaintiff:
Otis Fields, Jr
Defendant:
HSBC, MERS and Trott and Trott, PC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv12169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
