Cases 71 - 80 of 663
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Max v. Marsh et al
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Donna Max
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, Maureen O. Helmer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prawitt v. Intrusion, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Nathan Prawitt
Defendant:
Jack B. Blount, Michael L. Paxton, B. Franklin Byrd and others
Nominal Defendant:
Intrusion, Inc.
Wilson v. Viasat, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Viasat, Inc., Mark D. Dankberg, Richard A. Baldridge and others
Carlisle v. The National Security Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
The National Security Group, Inc., Walter P. Wilkerson, Fred D. Clark, Jr. and others
Caldwell v. Starke et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
ShaRon Caldwell
Defendant:
Dale E. Starke, James P. Piazza, Chief Thomas A. Johnson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Webb v. Hall et al
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Attorney James P. Hall, Kimberly A. Parks, Mary F. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wagner v. Lowe's Home Improvement et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Wagner
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, Lowe's Corporate N.C., Marvin Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Booth v. Byrd et al
as 1:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Booth
Defendant:
Randolph Byrd and Schneider National Carriers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
