Cases 71 - 80 of 483
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ortmann v. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Ortmann
Defendant:
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Peter Greenleaf and Joseph Miller
Petitioner:
Rasik Cauchon-Desai, ACDC Investments Limited, Roney Balson and others
Leacock v. IonQ, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Michael Leacock
Defendant:
IonQ, Inc., Peter Chapman and Thomas Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kramer v. Ground Zero Crypto, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CLARK KRAMER
Defendant:
GROUND ZERO CRYPTO, LLC, PETER CAMPBELL, JOSEPH BERGVINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
