Cases 71 - 80 of 799
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16344
Plaintiff:
KAYLE PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN v. SANCHEZ et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
S SANCHEZ, MAZINGO, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Circle K Stores Inc.
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Stacey Peterson
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14175
Plaintiff:
RICARDO PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13381
Plaintiff:
GASTON PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN SWAIN, RICKY DIXON, R MOLIN-MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Lee County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff, Dave Jennings, Justine Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12066
Plaintiff:
ADELEKE PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODMAN v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GOODMAN, BRANDON KOENIG-MESSER, RYAN LOIBL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
