Cases 71 - 80 of 1,869
In re Rule 45 Subpoenas Issued to Dr. Ron Najafi and Emery Pharma
as 3:2021mc80304
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelham Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Petitioner:
Dr. Ron Najafi and Najafi Pharma Inc, dba Emery Pharma
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Marlene Boyadjian v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv09378
Plaintiff:
Marlene Boyadjian
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yuinawa v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01971
Plaintiff:
Kazuyuki Yuinawa
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., Chattem, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
McBee v. Angotti et al
as 5:2021cv08921
Plaintiff:
Gary McBee
Defendant:
Vincent J. Angotti, Raffi Asadorian, Adrian Adams and others
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc v. Caraballo
as 3:2021cv08922
Plaintiff:
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc
Defendant:
Gerardo Caraballo
Coffman v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08646
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martha J. Demski, William W. Ericson and others
Annette Miller Follette v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2021cv08591
Plaintiff:
Annette Miller-Follette and Annette Miller Follette
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc, American Medical Systems, LLC, American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tran v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08417
Plaintiff:
Tran Tran
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Neil F. Mcfarlane, David L. Mahoney and others
Chang v. Angotti et al
as 5:2021cv08312
Plaintiff:
Winston Chang
Defendant:
Vincent J. Angotti, Raffi Asadorian, Adrian Adams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
