Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Cathryn Harmon v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York et al
as 2:2007cv07984
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Harmon
Defendant:
CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York and Salomon Smith Barney Ltd Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Financial Asset Trading and Technology of California v. Madison Tyler Holdings et al
as 2:2007cv07545
Plaintiff:
Financial Asset Trading and Technology of California
Defendant:
Madison Tyler Holdings, Madison Tyler, EWT and others
Counter Claimant:
EWT LLC, Madison Tyler Technology LLC and Madison Tyler Trading LLC
Counter Defendant:
John Benediktsson, David Salomon, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Susan Shade v. Cigna Life Isurance Company of New York et al
as 8:2007cv01319
Plaintiff:
Susan Shade and Susan Shade
Defendant:
Cigna Life Isurance Company of New York and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Adidas et al v. Am-Can Transport Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv04724
Plaintiff:
Adidas, Adidas, Adidas-Salomon NA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Am-Can Transport Services, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Valladares-Ramos vs Chertoff, et al
as 1:2007cv00736
Plaintiff:
Salomon Valladares-Ramos
Defendant:
Eduardo Aguirre, Michael Chertoff, Donald Ridding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Valladares-Ramos vs Chertoff, et al
as 1:2007at00234
Plaintiff:
Salomon Valladares-Ramos
Defendant:
Eduardo Aguirre, Michael Chertoff, Donald Ridding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Salomon Smith Barney v. Bradford H Sachs, et al
as 8:2001cv00141
Defendant:
Andra Lacho, Bradford H Sachs, Andra R Sachs and others
Plaintiff:
Salomon Smith Barney Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
