Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Maxon Hyundai Mazda et al v. Carfax, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02680
Plaintiff:
Westbury Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc., Fitzgerald Toyota Inc., Union Pontiac- GMC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Polesky et al v. Simm Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00848
Defendant:
American Education Services and Simm Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lois Polesky and Melissa Polesky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Armstrong v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Andre Armstrong
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Detective Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Speights v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00443
Defendant:
Detective Madelyn Ciprian-Dobles, City of New York, Lieutenant Drivick and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Speights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Speights v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00305
Defendant:
Detective Madelyn Ciprian-Dobles, City of New York, Lieutenant Drivick and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Speights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
