Cases 71 - 80 of 5,152
Mngadi v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Zama Mngadi
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Recinos v. Baulding et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brad Recinos
Defendant:
Sharikka Baulding, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Maxwell v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01531
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maxwell
Defendant:
The United States of America, Mehdi Syed Abedi, ABC, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dickerson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Jaime Lynn Dickerson
Defendant:
United States of America and Raquel Lilian Evans
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Curtis v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Wanda Curtis
Defendant:
United States of America
SLOAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SLOAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bragg v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Jacob Bragg
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HULING v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS D HULING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. Baulding et al
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Pablo Ramirez
Defendant:
Sharikka Baulding, United States of America, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
