Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Noe v. U.S.P. Lewisburg
as 3:2009cv00493
Petitioner:
Peter G. Noe
Respondent:
USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Clark v. USP Lewisburg
as 4:2008cv01639
Plaintiff:
Deonte Clark
Defendant:
USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Uhl vs. Warden
as 4:2008cv01294
Petitioner:
Phillip Prescott Uhl
Respondent:
Warden USP Lewisburg and Contri
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Williamson et al
as 1:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Rasheen Johnson
Defendant:
Troy Williamson, USP-Lewisburg and Receiving and Discharge staff at USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Riches v. USP Lewisburg
as 1:2008cv00351
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hronek v. Angelini et al
as 1:2007cv01228
Petitioner:
Terry Hronek
Respondent:
Christopher Angelini, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Lewisburg Satellite Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Black v. Warden, USP Lewisburg
as 3:2007cv00805
Petitioner:
Roderick Black
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hazel v. USP Lewisburg et al
as 1:2007cv00569
Petitioner:
William Hazel
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, USP Lewisburg and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ricketts v. AW of Unicor et al
as 1:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
David E. Ricketts
Defendant:
AW of Unicor, Mr. Laws, Mr. Chesley and others
Respondent:
District Attorney of Berks County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Warden USP Lewisburg
as 1:2007cv00013
Petitioner:
John J McCarthy
Respondent:
Warden USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
