Cases 71 - 80 of 14,945
Benitez-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
MANUEL DE JESUS BENITEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Escobar-Argueta v. Garland
as 24-1081
Petitioner:
BRYAN ESCOBAR-ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-1092
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ventura-Granados v. Garland
as 24-1102
Petitioner:
NOE ISMAEL VENTURA-GRANADOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz-Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1095
Petitioner:
ARELI YESSANIA ORTIZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Dominique White
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Fredderick Allen Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moco v. Garland
as 24-1067
Petitioner:
ROBERT MOCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Salis v. New York State Bar Association
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
OWOLABI SALIS
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DONALD ZOLIN, KEVIN J. DOYLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
