Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Untied States Government v. US Department of Labor, Region 5
as 0:2013cv62433
Plaintiff:
United States Government
Defendant:
US Department of Labor, Region 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv81104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105
Notz v. United States Government
as 5:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmon v. United States Government et al
as 0:2012cv62502
Plaintiff:
Christine Timmon
Defendant:
United States Government and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Espinosa v. United States Government et al
as 8:2012cv02818
Plaintiff:
Manuel E. Espinosa
Defendant:
United States Government, Commonwealth of Kentucky and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Staurt et al v. United States Government et al
as 1:2012cv23533
Plaintiff:
Leslie Stuart, Leslie Stuart, Jr., James Stuart and others
Defendant:
United States Government and Greg Gommel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Randolph v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Kelda K. Randolph
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNORS et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 5:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
VERNA CONNORS and GORDON VAUGHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. United States Government
as 0:2010cv60404
Plaintiff:
Leonard Aaron Hill
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
