Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 77 of 77
CLAY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv00603
Plaintiff: WILLIAM HENRY CLAY
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BANKS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00194
Petitioner: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, WARDEN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAWTHORNE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv02000
Plaintiff: JOHN W. HAWTHORNE
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, EDWARD REILLY, JR., COURT SERVICES OFFENDER SUPERVISORY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWTHORNE v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01142
Plaintiff: JOHN W. HAWTHORNE
Defendant: U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES OFFENDER and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN-CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2007cv00702
Petitioner: KENNETH WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN-CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY and U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00691
Plaintiff: ROGER JACKMAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00200
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR.
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?