Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 77 of 77
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. MANDARIN ORIENTAL, WASHINGTON, D.C. HOTEL
as 1:2008cv00574
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. GROUP LEGAL SERVICES FUND
Defendant: MANDARIN ORIENTAL, WASHINGTON, D.C. HOTEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
TIG INSURANCE COMPANY v. FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00528
Plaintiff: TIG INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
BUTLER et al v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, D.C., INC.
as 1:2008cv00231
Plaintiff: EMMA JEAN BUTLER and SHANTESE BUTLER
Defendant: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, D.C., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
ISLAMIC CENTER OF WASHINGTON, D.C. v. DARUI et al
as 1:2007mc00386
Petitioner: ISLAMIC CENTER OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
Respondent: FARZAD DARUI
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOWE v. WASHINGTON, D.C. et al
as 1:2007cv00049
Plaintiff: PHILLIPPI S. LOWE
Defendant: WASHINGTON, D.C., PRINCE GEORGE, MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY CITY AL., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?