Cases 71 - 80 of 6,337
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravlee v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee and John Kennedy
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County Authority, Oklahoma Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Seigars et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks
Defendant:
Jason Seigars, Paul Woodward and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Rinks et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Byrd
Defendant:
Corey Rinks and Dylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Patrick Morgan and Unknown Named Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Harlan James Sam
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kosier v. Garvin County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Austin Kosier
Defendant:
Garvin County Jail Staff and Garvin County Sheriffs Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
