Cases 71 - 80 of 6,717
CALLAWAY v. WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
OREADER CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUSTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NICOLESCU v. WARDEN FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
EMANUEL NICOLESCU
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HENRY v. DAVIS
as 2:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
BASIM HENRY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GANDY v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWNE v. CHETIRKIN
as 2:2023cv23399
Petitioner:
MARK BROWNE
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREENE v. CHARLES
as 2:2023cv23364
Petitioner:
GEORGE GREENE
Respondent:
RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.