Cases 71 - 80 of 1,396
Schultz v. Ruan Transportation Management Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04542
Plaintiff:
Jeff S. Schultz
Defendant:
Ruan Transportation Management Systems, Inc. and Ruan Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sheppard v. Village of Robbins, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
David Sheppard
Defendant:
Village of Robbins, Illinois, Darren BRYANT and Village Of Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HAMPTON v. AMERICREW, INC.
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
JASON HAMPTON
Defendant:
AMERICREW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stauffer v. Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Innovative Heights Fairview Heights, LLC, Pathfinder Software LLC d/b/a Centeredge Software, LLC, Pathfinder Software LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Madisyn Stauffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
NEELEY v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01887
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. NEELEY, JR.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dantzler v. GoHealth, LLC
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
Tyrah Dantzler
Defendant:
GoHealth, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Miner v. Central Management Services
as 3:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Maurice G. Miner
Defendant:
Central Management Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Keigan v. Tiram
as 1:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Albert Keigan
Defendant:
Aaron Tiram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
KEMP v. SMPRETTY, INC.
as 4:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KEMP
Defendant:
SMPRETTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Velazquez v. Jabil, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03406
Plaintiff:
Maria Felix Velazquez
Defendant:
Jabil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
