Cases 71 - 80 of 226
United States of America v. Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2017cv02069
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) in United States Currency
Claimant:
Brandon Darnell Hodges
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One (1) 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche, VIN 3GNNCEE05AG201240, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2016cv02001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche, VIN 3GNNCEE05AG201240, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon and One (1) 2007 Mercedes-Benz CLS550, VIN WDDDJ72X87A094088, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Travis Huston and Brittany Nicole Huston
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One (1) Elephant (Elephantidae) Ivory Crucifix et al
as 2:2015cv02813
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Elephant (Elephantidae) Ivory Crucifix
Claimant:
Eppli Auktionen and Murvyn Callo
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. Sixteen (16) Firearms and Assorted Ammunition et al
as 1:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sixteen (16) Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
Claimant:
Paul Roach and Nicole Sperando
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. Swift et al
as 2:2015cv02667
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Resa M. Swift and Tavious Swift
Defendant:
One 2006 Audi A8, VIN WAUML44E56N005385, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Three Hundred Seventy (370) Units of Hardware Bearing the Registered Trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02360
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Three Hundred Seventy (370) Units of Hardware Bearing the Registered Trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc.
Claimant:
London Network Systems, Ltd. and Core 3 Technologies
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One 2011 Porsche Panamera, VIN WP0AB2A70BL060142, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2015cv02308
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2011 Porsche Panamera, VIN WP0AB2A70BL060142, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon, One 2010 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN 2G1FK1EJ7A9226239, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon, One 2007 GMC Yukon Denali, VIN 1GKFK63897J388461, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon and others
Claimant:
Melvin Duncan, Pamela Hill-Duncan, Bernice Y. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, VIN 1C4RJEDJXCC329432, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, VIN 1C4RJEDJXCC329432, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon and One 2005 BMW 645Ci Convertible, VIN WBAEK73475B324241, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Kadaren D Sanders, Carlton D Rayford and Lecedrick Rayford
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Branch Banking and Trust Company Check #096 in the Amount of $181,576.95 and the funds traceable thereto et al
as 2:2015cv02087
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company Check #096 in the Amount of $181,576.95 and the funds traceable thereto, Branch Banking and Trust Company Check #097 in the Amount of $1,448.63 and the funds traceable thereto, Branch Banking and Trust Company Check #098 in the Amount of $1,830.00 and the funds traceable thereto and others
Claimant:
Cesar Rodriguez, Gustavo Rodriguez and Inteq, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. $164,023.22 in United States Funds et al
as 2:2014cv02905
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$164,023.22 in United States Funds and Five (5) Assorted Conveyances
Claimant:
Jared Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
