Cases 71 - 80 of 2,105
Foster (ID 92016) v. Geither et al
as 5:2023cv03089
Petitioner:
Rory Markel Foster and Rory Marcel Foster
Respondent:
Gloria Geither, Jeff Zmuda and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strader (ID 66677) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03100
Petitioner:
James C. Strader
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03076
Petitioner:
Clint Waylon Cook
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03061
Petitioner:
Everald S. Allen, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Kansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv03072
Petitioner:
Rico J. Brown, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Hazel M. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03050
Petitioner:
Tyrone Ramsey
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03038
Petitioner:
Michael A. Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brinkley (ID 60164) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03047
Petitioner:
Sherrell Gary Brinkley
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrow v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03026
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Respondent:
Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruhl v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03053
Petitioner:
Tyler A. Ruhl
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.