Cases 71 - 80 of 12,089
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00553
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nyambi v. Norgaard et al
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Tita Nyambi
Defendant:
Emily Norgaard, Humboldt County Superior Court, Humboldt County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Dean v. Zhang et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Michael Dean
Defendant:
Dr. Zhang, Dr. Roberts, John & Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonsalves v. CA et al
as 3:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Defendant:
CA, CDCR, Los Angeles Sheriff #65555 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. McConnell et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Judith McConnell, Judge William S. Dato and Judge Jerry Bryon O'Rourke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sammartino
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Judge Janis L. Sammartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scaggs v. USA
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Leonard Scaggs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
