Cases 71 - 80 of 10,843
Winfrey v. Louthan
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Ted James Winfrey
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arroliga v. USA
as 4:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Carlos Alfredo Arroliga
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Milton D. Grayson, Jr.
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodeur v. US Government
as 5:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beck v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Patrick Beck
Respondent:
FNU LNU, US Marshals and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
