Cases 81 - 90 of 284
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Qaid et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Nabaa Qaid, Lareen Al-Maliki and Al-Yan Al-Maliki
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States of America, The, Department of State, The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Safi v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
Shamim Bibi Safi and Alamzaib Safi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Donald Blome and Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shahram Alinaghiyan et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv06008
Plaintiff:
SHAHRAM ALINAGHIYAN and PRECISE COMPANY
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Anthony J. Blinken, Julie A, Eadeh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mejia v. Blinken
as 4:2023cv02675
Plaintiff:
Luis Javier Mejia
Defendant:
Secretary of State Anthony J. Blinken, Anthony J. Blinken and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
