Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Crews v. Hetzell et al
as 5:2008cv01927
Petitioner:
William Crews
Respondent:
Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crews v. Hetcell et al
as 5:2008cv01930
Petitioner:
William Crews
Defendant:
Gary Hetcell and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Culliver et al
as 5:2008cv01212
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Brooks
Respondent:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leshore v. King et al
as 2:2008cv01213
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lavonne Leshore
Respondent:
Troy King and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Forman v. Forniss et al
as 2:2008cv01105
Petitioner:
Darryl C Forman
Respondent:
Leon Forniss and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Minnefield v. Deville et al
as 2:2008cv01075
Petitioner:
Demetrius Ray Minnefield
Respondent:
Richard Deville and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Marcum et al
as 5:2008cv00929
Petitioner:
Ashley Doral Parker
Respondent:
Terry Marcum, Terry Marcum, Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Reddoch et al
as 7:2008cv00826
Petitioner:
Michael D. Hart
Respondent:
James Reddoch, James Reddoch, Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
as 4:2008cv00719
Petitioner:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrow v. Cummins et al
as 2:2008cv00643
Petitioner:
Marcus Dewayne Barrow
Respondent:
John Cummins and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
