Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Corey Dotson v. Catherine Bauman
as 14-2370
Petitioner - Appellant:
COREY DOTSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
James Kitchen v. Catherine Bauman
as 14-2363
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD KITCHEN
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, Warden
In re: Martinneze Moore
as 14-2296
Movant:
In re: MARTINNEZE MOORE
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Charles Fields v. Michael Martin, et al
as 14-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden and GERALD RILEY
Defendant:
DAN LESATZ, et al
Timothy Williams v. Catherine Bauman
as 14-1787
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Alrelio Evans v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 14-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALRELIO EVANS, (all similiarly situated prisoners) Other named Plaintiffs without signatures: D. Allison #416330, D. Settles #301268, K. Colvin Jr. #192744, C. West II #A237293,
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, KENNETH MCGINNIS, Director, MIKE MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Willie Debardelaben v. Richard McKeon, et al
as 14-1535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE DEBARDELABEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD M. MCKEON, former director of the MDOC, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, HEIDI SWAJANEN, Storekeeper and others
Charles Fields v. Scott Sprader, et al
as 14-1393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, Warden and others
Charles Holloway v. Catherine Bauman
as 13-2343
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HOLLOWAY
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, Warden
Patrick Kinney v. Catherine Bauman
as 13-2327
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK NEIL KINNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
