Cases 81 - 90 of 112
Melinda Valenzuela v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15036
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Theodore Rushing v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15015
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE R. RUSHING
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jimmie Beasley, Jr. v. Charles Ryan
as 18-70026
Petitioner:
JIMMIE O. BEASLEY, Jr.
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Ronnie Vera v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17559
Petitioner - Appellee:
RONNIE ROY VERA
Respondent - Appellant:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
John Neuendorf, II v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 17-17557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN NEUENDORF II, AKA J. Neuendorf, AKA John Calvin Neuendorf
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: Unknown Partys at Lewis Prison, DANIEL WILLIAMS, ROBERT TRIAS, Corrections Officer III at ASPC Lewis and others
Dale Maisano v. Core Civic, et al
as 17-17556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE FRANK MAISANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CORE CIVIC, JEANNE K. OLSON, Core Civic Doctor, LOUISE MIRACLE, Nurse Practitioner and others
John Helie v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17497
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN JAY HELIE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, named as Charles Ryan and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael Sprouse v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE SPROUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, LANCE R. HETMER, Florence Complex Warden (at time) (ADC) at Central Office and GREG FIZER
Frank Garcia v. Charles Ryan
as 17-73305
Petitioner:
FRANK NUNEZ GARCIA, AKA Fransisco Nunez Contreras II
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Michael Isham v. Charles Ryan
as 17-73307
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DARRIN ISHAM
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
