Cases 81 - 90 of 235
Lewis v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Stroger/Fantus Hospital, Dr. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marbley v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Bobby Marbley
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv09319
Plaintiff:
Freddie Sears
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv08413
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Alexander
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Jane Doe and Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv06407
Plaintiff:
Freddie Sears
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Jay and T. Cleary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayford v. Cermak Health Services of Cook County et al
as 1:2017cv05942
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rayford
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services of Cook County, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2017cv03666
Plaintiff:
Lewis Stuckey
Defendant:
Dr. Hoffman, Carlos Altez and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCune et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv01706
Plaintiff:
Delvon McCune
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Sergent Kilpeck, Correction Officer Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cella v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Michael Cella
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Sheriff of Cook County, Cermak Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Jesus v. Medical Staff Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Eduardo De Jesus
Defendant:
Medical Staff Cermak Health Services, Cook County Hospital and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
