Cases 81 - 90 of 4,925
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03239
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Sroga v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
as 24-1725
Petitioner:
KEVIN SROGA
Respondent:
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Tuck v. Cook County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Cook County Correctional Facility and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cook County Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv04709
Plaintiff:
Elijah Washington
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Murphy v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03745
Plaintiff:
Celena Murphy
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04538
Defendant:
Cook County Div. 8 Classifications Supervisor, Thomas Dart and Cermak Medical Service/Staff
Plaintiff:
Sammy O. Trice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Honey v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Devontae H. Honey
Defendant:
Lombardi, Rodriguez, Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huerta v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03452
Plaintiff:
Jose V. Huerta
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
