Cases 81 - 90 of 2,725
H.S. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02982
Plaintiff:
Heather Schneider, Andrew Schneider, Z. S. and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
ROBINSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv02961
Plaintiff:
JAVONTE ROBINSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ECHELON COMMUNITY SERVICES-KIA'S PLACE IV, ROXANNE MURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
as 1:2023cv02935
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02934
Not Classified By Court:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02933
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Claimant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
STOKES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE STOKES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
LAWRENCE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02916
Plaintiff:
PETER LAWRENCE and DIANA MARINOVA
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
