Cases 81 - 90 of 280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BYRD et al v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv01542
Plaintiff:
BYRD, TINA BYRD and ARNOLD BYRD
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, CONSOLIDATED ENERGY COMPANY, STRATA WORLDWIDE, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MCANANY v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv05173
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCANANY
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
COLLINS et al v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
RANDAL W. COLLINS and KELLY S. COLLINS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARKEY et al v. SPARK ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01597
Plaintiff:
MARKEY, EARL MARKEY and FATU BADIANE MARKEY
Defendant:
SPARK ENERGY LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Mutual Minds, LLC v. Shelly et al
as 1:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
Mutual Minds, LLC
Defendant:
Tron Shelly , Rick Miller , iDrive Interactive, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
