Cases 81 - 90 of 138
HAMPTON et al v. BIG G EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01234
Defendant:
BIG G EXPRESS, INC. and RICHARD JONES
Plaintiff:
ABAGAIL HAMPTON and NATHANIAL HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carter v. Bacheldor et al
as 2:2015cv00242
Defendant:
Scott E. Bacheldor and Vitran Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Latrina Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. BALDWIN et al
as 1:2015cv00917
Defendant:
B&T EXPRESS, INC. and RUSSELL F. BALDWIN
Plaintiff:
ROGER A. SMITH and TINA F. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griffin v. M1 Express Inc.
as 1:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Richard Griffin
Defendant:
M1 Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LANGLEY et al v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2015cv00784
Defendant:
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC. OF IOWA and DAMON JACKSON
Plaintiff:
M. L. and KRISTINA LANGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tate v. Pasilis et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tate
Defendant:
Remigijus Pasilis , HMD Trucking Inc and RSK Express Inc
Mediator:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILIATREAU v. PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00489
Defendant:
JAMES BLOTNER and PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY FILIATREAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAY v. PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00488
Defendant:
JAMES BLOTNER and PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MAY v. PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00492
Defendant:
JAMES BLOTNER and PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SHARTZER v. PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00493
Defendant:
JAMES BLOTNER and PI&I MOTOR EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SHARTZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
