Cases 81 - 90 of 144
Mungia v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv02443
Plaintiff:
Luis J Mungia
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2014cv02445
Plaintiff:
Freddie B Moore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Segrera-Delaespriella v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Enrique Segrera-Delaespriella
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Chuck Maiorana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2014cv01658
Plaintiff:
Daniel W Kinard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morgan v. USA et al
as 1:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cody Morgan
Defendant:
USA, Dept of Justice, U S Attorney Executive Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shepherd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Arthur E Shepherd
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Palmer, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thornton v. USA
as 1:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
James M Thornton
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock Medium
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale and Asst Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glen Stine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale and Asst Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakes v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2014cv00421
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
