Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Cornwell v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv02174
Petitioner:
Walter D Cornwell
Respondent:
Claude Finn and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur v. Finn
as 2:2007cv02096
Petitioner:
Latrayl D. Arthur
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Finn
as 2:2007cv01925
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Williams
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
de Vries v. Board of Prison Hearings et al
as 2:2007cv01926
Petitioner:
Michael F de Vries
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings, Claude E. Finn and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01924
Petitioner:
William Cunningham
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arther v. Finn
as 3:2007cv04521
Petitioner:
Latrayl Arther
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graff v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01647
Petitioner:
Kelly Graff
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Finn
as 2:2007cv01513
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dee Gray
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01470
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Lucas
Respondent:
Claude Finn and Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Finn
as 2:2007cv01455
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Lucas
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
