Cases filed in Florida
Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Hooker et al v. Hopkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00750
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr. and Robert A. McDonald
Defendant: Wallace Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Moody
as 8:2014cv01090
Plaintiff: Carlton Hooker
Defendant: James S. Moody, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker Gordon v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2014cv21478
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Hooker Gordon
Defendant: NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00333
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooker v. Shinseki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00344
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Shogren et al
as 8:2013cv01655
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant: Robert C. Shogren , Lionel Barela and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Executive Diesel Marine, LLC v. M/Y Island Hooker
as 0:2013cv60418
Plaintiff: Executive Diesel Marine, LLC
Defendant: M/Y Island Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv02759
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooker v. NCL Bahamas Ltd.
as 1:2012cv21666
Defendant: NCL Bahamas, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Steve Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff: Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant: United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?