Cases filed in Florida
Cases 81 - 90 of 791
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01553
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hansen v. United States Customs and Immigration Services
as 1:2023cv20223
Plaintiff: Thore Holm Hansen
Defendant: United States Customs and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 145
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff: RODNEY HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00045
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff: RICHMOND HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff: WILTON HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Cell Search Team et al
as 2:2022cv14421
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Shavon Smith, III
Defendant: Cell Search Team, Dale Vaughn, Bobby J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bay County, Florida et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00297
Plaintiff: Bay County, Florida, Calhoun County, Florida, City of Niceville, Florida and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc. and MCKINSEY AND COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24947
Plaintiff: JOSHUA HOLMES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rushing v. Williamson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv02817
Plaintiff: Carla Laverne Rushing
Defendant: Rachelle Williamson, Douglas Roberts, Neil Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?