Cases 81 - 90 of 202
Mu Bey v. JP. Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2014cv09912
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Mu Bey
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wirbicki Law Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hassoun et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2014cv09855
Plaintiff:
Kalid Hassoun and Denise Hassoun
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., Seterus, Inc., Federal National Morgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2014cv09159
Plaintiff:
Gennard Barber
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2019cv09159
Plaintiff:
Gennard Barber
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardney v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage et al
as 1:2014cv08486
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hardney
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Ernest J. Codilis and Associates and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv06473
Plaintiff:
LaShanda Williams
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. , Carrington Property Services, LLC and Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2014cv05727
Plaintiff:
Shirley S. Black
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popoola v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2014cv05665
Plaintiff:
Abiola Popoola
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Jenkins
as 1:2014cv04278
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Defendant:
Lindsay Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
