Cases 81 - 90 of 647
Hopper v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2020cv04024
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Miriam Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv03695
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPICE v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
as 2:2020cv03345
Plaintiff:
JOHNEEN S SPICE
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pelczar v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
as 2:2020cv03056
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Pelczar
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOTT v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
as 2:2020cv02871
Plaintiff:
MEGAN K MOTT
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASSMAN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02234
Plaintiff:
REBECCA GASSMAN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02207
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DENISE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02183
Plaintiff:
Mary Lee Allen and LEONARD ALMOND
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEDFORD COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv01385
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BEDFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sugar Notch Borough, Pennsylvania v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Walgreen Boots Alliance, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Generics Bidco I, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sugar Notch Borough, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
