Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Pearson v. Williams
as 3:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sam J. Pearson, IV
Defendant:
Joseph M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv02761
Petitioner:
Ravis M. Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stearns Bank, N.A. v. Diagnostic Outpatient Centers, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01597
Plaintiff:
Stearns Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Diagnostic Outpatient Centers, Inc., South County Land Holdings, LLP, Larry J. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00593
Plaintiff:
Erik Sanchez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Walter A. McNeil, J. A. Gainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TINA M WILLIAMS, FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00562
Petitioner:
Douglas M. Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siever et al v. BWGaskets, Inc. et al
as 9:2009mc80982
Plaintiff:
Robert Siever, Robert Siever, Ginney Siever and others
Defendant:
BWGaskets, Inc., Bruce M. Williams and Ann P. Williams
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Ocasio v. American Roaming Network, Inc. et al
as 9:2009cv80881
Plaintiff:
Wanda E Ocasio
Defendant:
American Roaming Network, Inc., Interactive Media Technologies, Inc., GlobalTel LD Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
