Cases 81 - 90 of 124
MAXWELL v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv00747
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MAXWELL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CARTER v. MAXWELL
as 3:2011cv06809
Plaintiff:
AARON CARTER
Defendant:
TRAVIS MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (ERVAN CRIBB)
as 1:2011cv04033
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
ERVAN CRIBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (NAJEE BLACKMAN)
as 1:2011cv04032
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
NAJEE BLACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION
as 1:1997av09999
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (HAMPTON JENKS)
as 1:2011cv04034
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
HAMPTON JENKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (CHARLES WRENN)
as 1:2011cv04036
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WRENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (OTTO KRUPP)
as 1:2011cv04035
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
OTTO KRUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
